Study investigates how to turn stem cells into motor neurons

em cells can develop into many different types of cells, such as muscle cells, red blood cells, or neurons. Given their special regenerative ability, stem cells can be used to treat a wide range of diseases. A team of researchers uncovers new details involved in the process of turning stem cells into motor neurons.
[stem cells]
New research discovers details involved in reprogramming stem cells into motor neurons.

Somatic stem cells – also called adult stem cells – are undifferentiated cells that can be found throughout the human body in a tissue or organ. Their role is to maintain, renew, and repair the tissue in which they are found.

Through epigenetic reprogramming techniques – first introduced in 2006 by Nobel Prize winner Shinya Yamanaka and colleagues – these cells have been artificially transformed into neural stem cells.

This process involved transforming fibroblasts – a type of cell found in connective tissue – first into pluripotent cells, then into neural stem cells, and finally into neurons.

In direct reprogramming, however, the pluripotency stage is skipped. This allows for the transformation to take place in a more timely manner, and it also bypasses other limitations and risks of tumor formation found in the regular reprogramming technique.

Direct reprogramming has been used before to regenerate missing or damaged motor neurons. New research uncovers details of the transformation process that could one day enable researchers to create new types of cells.

The findings have been published in the journal Cell Stem Cell.

Studying direct reprogramming of stem cells

The researchers analyzed the changes that occur in the cells during the direct reprogramming process.

The transformation takes around 2 days.

The process involves three transcription factors. These are genes that control the expression of other genes.

In order to understand the cellular and genetic mechanisms behind the transformation, researchers analyzed how these transcription factors bind to the genome, how the genes expression changes, and how chromatin changes every 6 hours.

Uwe Ohler, senior researcher at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin and one of the lead authors of the study, explains why researchers were interested in these changes.

Shaun Mahony, assistant professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Penn State and one of the lead authors of the paper, explains what enabled them to study these changes in such minute detail:

“We have a very efficient system in which we can transform stem cells into motor neurons with something like a 90 to 95 percent success rate by adding the cocktail of transcription factors. Because of that efficiency, we were able to use our system to tease out the details of what actually happens in the cell during this transformation.”

Changing stem cells into motor neurons

Researchers uncovered a series of highly complex, independent changes that together converge to change the stem cells into motor neurons.

Early in the transformation process, two of the transcription factors – Isl1 and Lhx3 – together bind to the genome and trigger a chain reaction of events that includes changes in the chromatin and gene expression in cells.

The third transcription factor – Ngn2 – acts on its own, also making changes to the gene expression.

Later in the process, Isl1 and Lhx3 use the changes made by Ngn2 to complete the transformation.

For the direct programming to succeed, the two parallel processes must successfully converge.

Cell replacement may help treat neurodegenerative diseases

The study not only details the challenges of cell-replacement technology, but it also leads the way to developing new, more efficient methods of replacing damaged cells. This could prove invaluable in the treatment of some neurodegenerative diseases.

“There is a lot of interest in generating motor neurons to study basic developmental processes as well as human diseases like ALS and spinal muscular atrophy,” says Mahony.

The advantages of direct reprogramming include the fact that it can be done either in vitro or in vivo. Performing the reprogramming inside the human body – in vivo – has the advantage of being localized, at the site of cellular damage.

[Source:- medicalnewstoday]